Site icon Jimerson Birr

Employers’ Guide to Reducing the Risk of Retaliation Claims

Retaliation claims are among the most common issues employers face, often arising from misunderstandings, mismanagement, or inadequate policies. In fact, retaliation consistently tops the list of charges filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Preventing these claims requires more than just compliance with the law—it demands a proactive approach to systems and transparency within your organization. This blog provides actionable steps employers can take to reduce the risk of retaliation claims.

The Root Cause: Understanding Retaliation

Retaliatory Conduct

Retaliation occurs when an employer takes adverse action against an employee for engaging in protected activities. “Protected activities” is a broad category of employee-conduct that is protected by law, such as:

Adverse actions can include demotions, terminations, pay cuts, or even subtle behaviors like exclusion from meetings or reduced responsibilities. The key is whether the action would discourage a reasonable person from reporting concerns or otherwise exercising their rights.

Employers must remain vigilant to avoid both intentional and unintentional retaliation. Even well-meaning actions, such as reassigning an employee to a different team to “avoid conflict” could be effectively punitive—or interpreted as such—if not handled transparently.

Protected Activities

Protected activities are employee-conduct which have a basis for, or are supported by, employment regulation. It is not possible to list all protected activities, and the analysis would necessarily turn on the particular facts of each case. However, below is a list of some examples of protected activities:

  Reporting Workplace Discrimination or Harassment

  Participating in an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Investigation

  Opposing Unlawful Employment Practices

  Requesting a Reasonable Accommodation for a Disability

  Exercising Rights Under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act

  Filing or Participating in a Complaint about Wage Violations

  Engaging in Union Activities or Collective Bargaining

  Reporting Workplace Safety Hazards

  Taking Leave for Medical or Family Reasons

  Blowing the Whistle on Illegal Activities

  Filing for Workers’ Compensation

  Serving on a Jury or Testifying in Court

  Discussing Wages or Workplace Conditions

  Exercising Rights Under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)

Five Strategies to Reduce the Risk of Retaliation Claims

  1. Develop Clear, Enforceable Policies
    Start by creating comprehensive anti-retaliation policies. These should:
    • Explicitly define retaliation and provide examples.
    • Assure employees that reporting concerns will not result in punishment.
    • Outline reporting procedures for concerns about retaliation itself.
    • Regularly update policies to reflect changes in federal, state, and local laws, and ensure they are easily accessible to employees. 
  2. Train Managers and Supervisors
    Managers often unintentionally commit retaliatory acts due to a lack of understanding. Training is essential to ensure they:
    • Recognize protected activities and their legal significance.
    • Understand how their actions—such as excluding employees or changing their roles—could be perceived as retaliatory.
    • Respond appropriately to complaints or whistleblowing. 
  3. Encourage a Culture of Transparency
    Transparency reduces suspicion and builds trust. Ensure that:
    • Employees feel safe voicing concerns.
    • Changes in roles, duties, or employment status are clearly communicated and supported by objective, documented reasoning. 
  4. Document and Investigate Complaints Thoroughly
    When employees report concerns:
    • Promptly document their complaints.
    • Conduct a thorough, unbiased investigation.
    • Keep detailed records of all actions taken in response, including interviews and resolutions.
      Documentation is not just for internal clarity—it can be critical evidence if a claim is brought forward. 
  5. Separate Decision-Making from Complaints
    Avoid involving managers directly implicated in a complaint in subsequent employment decisions concerning the complaining employee. This reduces the perception of bias or retaliation.

Conclusion: Building Trust and Compliance

Reducing the risk of retaliation claims isn’t just about avoiding lawsuits; it’s about fostering a workplace where employees feel valued, respected, and safe to voice concerns. By implementing clear policies, providing training, and emphasizing transparency, employers can minimize risks and build a culture of accountability.

If you’re unsure about your current practices or need help navigating a complex situation, consult with a legal professional. A small investment in proactive legal guidance today can save your organization significant challenges in the future. Contact Jimerson Birr today!

Exit mobile version